Saturday, February 5, 2011

Prescott, Arizona

Be Grateful for Graphic Elements:   Here the graphic element is a sepia-toned photograph taking you back to the early 20th century.  And still there is room for 108 words (plenty!).  Can we please liberate more photos from the archives where nobody sees them?  Now, find the other graphic element. [2009]

Thursday, February 3, 2011

Nashville, Tennessee

Be Grateful for Graphic Elements:  The graphic element on this marker is a front elevation.  It helps us envision Jefferson Street past so much better than words ever could.   "Razed":  a simple and emotionally evocative concept.  Now, look at what a magnificent structure replaced the Heiman House!  [2009]

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Cuba, Alabama

Be Grateful for Graphic Elements:  Graphics are rare on historical markers.  Among graphic elements, maps are even rarer (likewise, textual references to imaginary lines).  This marker is also a good example of 'history as chronology.'  [1985]

Monday, January 31, 2011

Pawtucket, Rhode Island

Don't be square!  I guess the folks at Slater's Mill didn't get the memo, because here they gave us a perfect square.  But as we all learned in school:  a good short story begins with an enticing title!  Too bad the river gets no credit at all.  [2009]

Saturday, January 29, 2011

Cardiff, Wales

Don't be square!  In fact, don't even be angular.  In the British Isles, ovals and medallions seem to be used much more frequently than in the United States.  [2005]

Friday, January 28, 2011

Rehoboth Beach, Delaware

Don't be square!  'Landscape' is more common than 'portrait' when it comes to historical markers.  Nevertheless, most markers are not perfect rectangles.  Various design elements usually give them a lift at top center.  "Attracting thousands of visitors each year."  Wouldn't that go without saying?  [1995]

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Hudson, Michigan

Don't be square!  Stand up tall and stay in shape.  But, we don't seem to know what the best shape is for historical markers.  To-the-point it is, but why mention Adrian when you are trying to call attention to the importance of Hudson?  [2008]